BEFORE I MOVE ON, BECAUSE WE HAVE HAD A NUMBER OF MEMBERS ON THIS COMMITTEE COMMENT ON CAMERAS IN THE COURT, I HAVE MADE MY POSITION ON THIS CLEAR A LOT OF TIMES, BUT IF I CAN GIVE A TINY BIT TO THE COURT IN ADVANCE, I THINK IT SHOULD BE A DECISION FOR THE SUPREME COURT TO MAKE ABOUT WHETHER OR NOT THERE ARE CAMERAS IN THE COURTROOM. NOT A DECISION FOR THE ARTICLE ONE BRANCH TO MAKE FOR ARTICLE THREE. IT IS IMPORTANT FOR US TO RECOGNIZE, I THINK I DIFFER FROM A LOT OF MY COLLEAGUES ON THIS WHO ARE ADVOCATES FOR CAMERAS IN THE COURTROOM, I GET THEIR POSITION THAT TRANSPARENCY IS A VIRTUE. TRANSPARENCY IS A GOOD THING. I BELIEVE PIN AND PAD CAN FACILITATE A LOT OF TRANSPARENCY JUST FINE. IT IS HEALTHY FOR AMERICANS TO RECOGNIZE THE SECOND AND THIRD AND FOURTH ORDER OF EFFECTS OF CAMERAS. CAMERAS CHANGE HUMAN BEHAVIOR. YOU DON'T HAVE THE SAME KINDS OF CONVERSATIONS OVER THE DINNER TABLE WITH YOUR FAMILY WHEN YOU ARE WRESTLING THROUGH ISSUES, APOLOGIZING FOR SOMETHING. I SAID THIS BEFORE, BUT MAYBE I SHOULD MODIFY WHAT I SAID. MY TONE WAS JERKY, I DIDN'T MODIFY FOR YOUR OPINION. IF THEY ARE NOT IN MIND OF A CAMERA THEY ARE TRYING TO CREATE A SOUNDBITE FOUR, INSTAGRAM CAN BE USED FOR SMALL THINGS, BUT FOR INTELLECTUAL DISCOURSE, IT IS NOT A FRIEND. WE SHOULD RECOGNIZE THE JACK AS -- WE OFTEN SEE AROUND HERE -- WE ARE NOT TRYING TO PERSUADE JUSTICES BUT TRYING TO GET ON CABLE THAT NIGHT OR GET A VIRAL VIDEO. I HOPE THE COURT DOESN'T RESPOND TO SOME WELL-MEANING IMPULSES FROM THE CONGRESS TO PUSH FOR CAMERAS IN THE COURTROOM BUT ALSO SOME BULLYING. THERE ARE WAYS YOU CAN GET TO A LOT OF TRANSPARENCY. A LOT OF RECORDINGS ARE INCREASINGLY RELEASED FROM THE SUPREME COURT IN TIME WE ARE FASHION OVER THE FEW DECADES. I AM GLAD YOU ARE THE COURT ARE MAKING THAT DECISION AND IT IS NOT MADE FOR YOU BY THE CONGRESS. I WANT TO GO BACK TO THE LEGITIMACY OF THE SUPREME COURT. THE TERM THAT HAS BEEN USED OVER THE PAST FEW DAYS, DO YOU THINK THE SUPREME COURT IS LEGITIMATE? JUDGE JACKSON: I DO, SENATOR. ...