THIS IS AN AREA WHERE THE EMERGENCE OF NEW TECHNOLOGIES MAKES IT LIKELY, I BELIEVE, SHOULD YOU BE CONFIRMED, YOU WILL HAVE TO CONSIDER FOURTH AMENDMENT CLAIMS IN LIGHT OF CIRCUMSTANCES THAT COULDN'T HAVE BEEN ANTICIPATED AT THE TIME OF THE DRAFTING OF THE CONSTITUTION AND INDEED CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION HAS ALREADY EVOLVED OVER TIME TO ADAPT TO THE REALITY OF NEW TECHNOLOGIES FROM PHONE BOOTHS, CLASSIC CASE IN THE 1960'S, WHETHER A CLOSED PHONE BOOTH DOOR DEMONSTRATES AN EXPECTATION OF PRIVACY TO MORE RECENT CASE LAW INVOLVING GEOLOCATION DATA FROM CELL PHONES. AND I WANT TO URGE YOU, SHOULD YOU BE CONFIRMED, TO REMAIN VIGILANT ABOUT HOW THE EMERGENCE OF NEW TECHNOLOGIES, THE WAY THEY BECOME UBIQUITOUS IN OUR LIVES, THE WAY THAT VIRTUAL SPACES ARE ACCUSINGLY AKIN TO PHYSICAL SPACES WILL REQUIRE THE COURT TO CONSIDER VERY COMPLEX QUESTIONS AND TO SEEK TECHNICAL ADVICE BECAUSE THESE ARE TECHNOLOGICALLY COMPLEX QUESTIONS BECAUSE HOW WILL THE COURT SEEK, BECAUSE OF THEIR JUSTICE AND CLERK, AND IF FOR EXAMPLE ONE SUCH METHOD OF SEEKING ADVICE IS THROUGH AMIKI AND WHAT'S THE PROCESS OF UNDERSTANDING THE ORIGIN OR FUNDING SOURCE OF SUCH BRIEFS SUBMITTED TO THE COURT. IT'S A TWO PART QUESTION. I WANT TO RESTATE. AGAIN, FIRST, I WANT TO URGE YOU SHOULD YOU BE CONFIRMED, AS I'M CONFIDENT YOU WILL, TO VIGOROUSLY DEFEND THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS TO AMERICAN CITIZENS AGAINST UNREASONABLE SEARCH AND SEIZURES, HEAR HOW YOU APPROACH SEEKING TECHNICAL EXPERTISE TO INFORM THAT DECISIONMAKING. AND THE QUESTION OF TRANSPARENCY TO BRIEFS FILED BEFORE THE COURT, SOMETHING JUSTICE SCALIA NOTED IN CAMPAIGN FINANCE LAWS, IT'S IMPORTANT FOR THE PUBLIC TO KNOW WHO IS FUNDING ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGIES, IT'S IMPORTANT TO KNOW WHO IS BRIEFING THEM AND WHAT THE MOTIVE OF FUNDING SOURCE OF SUCH BRIEFS COULD BE. WOULD YOU PLEASE WITH MY REMAINING TIME AND I'LL YIELD AND WE'LL HAVE MORE TIME LATER TO DISCUSS WARPOWERS. COULD YOU PLEASE COMMENT ON THOSE MATTERS, THOSE WILL BE MY FINAL QUESTIONS FOR THIS ROUND.